Photo 27 Sep 203 notes 
“Silent Spring” was published 50 years ago this month. Though she did not set out to do so, Carson influenced the environmental movement as no one had since the 19th century’s most celebrated hermit, Henry David Thoreau, wrote about Walden Pond. “Silent Spring” presents a view of nature compromised by synthetic pesticides, especially DDT. Once these pesticides entered the biosphere, Carson argued, they not only killed bugs but also made their way up the food chain to threaten bird and fish populations and could eventually sicken children. Much of the data and case studies that Carson drew from weren’t new; the scientific community had known of these findings for some time, but Carson was the first to put them all together for the general public and to draw stark and far-reaching conclusions. In doing so, Carson, the citizen-scientist, spawned a revolution.
“Silent Spring,” which has sold more than two million copies, made a powerful case for the idea that if humankind poisoned nature, nature would in turn poison humankind. “Our heedless and destructive acts enter into the vast cycles of the earth and in time return to bring hazard to ourselves,” she told the subcommittee. We still see the effects of unfettered human intervention through Carson’s eyes: she popularized modern ecology.
If anything, environmental issues have grown larger — and more urgent — since Carson’s day. Yet no single work has had the impact of “Silent Spring.” It is not that we lack eloquent and impassioned environmental advocates with the capacity to reach a broad audience on issues like climate change. Bill McKibben was the first to make a compelling case, in 1989, for the crisis of global warming in “The End of Nature.” Elizabeth Kolbert followed with “Field Notes From a Catastrophe.” Al Gore sounded the alarm with “An Inconvenient Truth,” and was awarded the Nobel Prize. They are widely considered responsible for shaping our view of global warming, but none was able to galvanize a nation into demanding concrete change in quite the way that Carson did.

(via How ‘Silent Spring’ Ignited the Environmental Movement - NYTimes.com)
Silent Spring was published on September 27, 1962 — 50 years ago today.

“Silent Spring” was published 50 years ago this month. Though she did not set out to do so, Carson influenced the environmental movement as no one had since the 19th century’s most celebrated hermit, Henry David Thoreau, wrote about Walden Pond. “Silent Spring” presents a view of nature compromised by synthetic pesticides, especially DDT. Once these pesticides entered the biosphere, Carson argued, they not only killed bugs but also made their way up the food chain to threaten bird and fish populations and could eventually sicken children. Much of the data and case studies that Carson drew from weren’t new; the scientific community had known of these findings for some time, but Carson was the first to put them all together for the general public and to draw stark and far-reaching conclusions. In doing so, Carson, the citizen-scientist, spawned a revolution.

“Silent Spring,” which has sold more than two million copies, made a powerful case for the idea that if humankind poisoned nature, nature would in turn poison humankind. “Our heedless and destructive acts enter into the vast cycles of the earth and in time return to bring hazard to ourselves,” she told the subcommittee. We still see the effects of unfettered human intervention through Carson’s eyes: she popularized modern ecology.

If anything, environmental issues have grown larger — and more urgent — since Carson’s day. Yet no single work has had the impact of “Silent Spring.” It is not that we lack eloquent and impassioned environmental advocates with the capacity to reach a broad audience on issues like climate change. Bill McKibben was the first to make a compelling case, in 1989, for the crisis of global warming in “The End of Nature.” Elizabeth Kolbert followed with “Field Notes From a Catastrophe.” Al Gore sounded the alarm with “An Inconvenient Truth,” and was awarded the Nobel Prize. They are widely considered responsible for shaping our view of global warming, but none was able to galvanize a nation into demanding concrete change in quite the way that Carson did.

(via How ‘Silent Spring’ Ignited the Environmental Movement - NYTimes.com)

Silent Spring was published on September 27, 1962 — 50 years ago today.

#Silent Spring #Rachel Carson #pesticide #environment #pollution #ecology #DDT #history #science

  1. inrefsramblings reblogged this from sesmithereens
  2. sesmithereens reblogged this from fem-inist
  3. natureandculture reblogged this from fem-inist
  4. fem-inist reblogged this from amusingmanyourfather
  5. amusingmanyourfather reblogged this from knitmeapony
  6. applenapoleon reblogged this from lizardtakesflight
  7. fredgodof reblogged this from sciencechicks
  8. thebeautifulpeeple reblogged this from sciencechicks
  9. bamb-ish reblogged this from vanesa
  10. kactusnz reblogged this from sciencechicks
  11. allcapsdoom reblogged this from knitmeapony
  12. beneviani reblogged this from sciencechicks
  13. kittytumbling reblogged this from grumpish
  14. thepermeableboundary reblogged this from lies
  15. rabiescity reblogged this from jeankirschteinkickflippingalone
  16. lies reblogged this from dendroica and added:
    I think about Rachel Carson’s last few summers in Maine a lot.
  17. maiajune reblogged this from masterofthedinos
  18. planetearthofficial reblogged this from officialharvard
  19. the-hairyfairy reblogged this from dendroica
  20. loquacity reblogged this from knitmeapony
  21. jeankirschteinkickflippingalone reblogged this from saphire-dance
  22. undeadsidhe-inthetardis reblogged this from takingbackshannon
  23. masterofthedinos reblogged this from wuzzymolecules

Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.